Logo Design
Home
BLOG - Stephen Maxwell is Treasurer of the Scottish Independence Convention and a trustee of a number of Scottish charities... This web site is maintained by people of all politics and none who believe that, after a long absence of three hundred years, Scotland should be a normal country again, rediscovering full participation among the two hundred sovereign nations of the globe...We are now on Bebo and Facebook, see contacts for details...
Home
About Convention
Let Scotland Decide
Forum
Contact Us
Resources
Media
Sign-Up
Murray Ritchie

 

 

Murray Ritchie, Convention Convenor and former political editor of The Herald.

If you would like to read comments or write one of your own scroll down the bottom of this page.

Header_Bar
The Blog -
Murray Ritchie

THREE WAYS TO WIN THE BATTLE FOR INDEPENDENCE

So where do we go from here? After another milestone on the road to independence was passed on Tuesday with the launch of the independence white paper, we are in completely new political territory. It is a most agreeable place.

In the space of a week the Scottish Labour Party capitulated on the issue of new powers for Holyrood, following the Tory example of a few months ago. Alex Salmond and the SNP – now the most popular first minister and executive ever in Scotland - have forced constitutional change not just at home but across the United Kingdom. Sometimes I have to pinch myself to believe it. In London Gordon Brown is talking up constitutional reform (as if he had a choice) as he surveys in bewilderment the new shape of British politics. He sees Labour leading in England but in despair in Scotland, its once impregnable citadel. No wonder the prime minister is a worried man: he knows if he loses Scotland at Westminster as he has done in Holyrood he (probably) loses England, and then the game will be up. He knows the Tories know it, too.

Never has the independence movement in Scotland had more clout. Even the outgoing first minister is denied his seat in the Lords presumably because he can’t risk a by-election in deepest Lanarkshire for fear of the SNP. Truly these are unprecedented times. Enjoy.

Seems to me that independistas now need to do three things. First, we should join the national conversation to argue the economic advantages of independence. We know that most disinterested economists who study the facts accept readily that we have a strong case. But we should remember that Unionism has had 300 years in government to brainwash the people of Scotland into believing otherwise. There are still many who accept without question that we are too poor and helpless to be other than dependent. So there is a challenging job to do there. When you see what an SNP government can do in 90 days, never mind three centuries, we can safely conclude the force is with us.

Second, we must deal with the eternal charge that those who want a better Scotland are separatists or isolationists or Anglophobes. This familiar smear may be venal but it works – which is why Labour in particular uses it when as now it is losing the argument. Abuse is always useful in place of reason. Expect much more negativity from the Unionist parties – and deal with it as we did in the May elections.

And third we have to tackle the persistent claim that the Scottish people don’t really want independence. This is deployment of the theory that if you tell a lie often enough people will believe it. Yet a study of opinion polls tells another story. If you look at the many polls taken over the past decade or so in which the question of independence is put as a simple Yes or No – with no other options or red-herring-type diversions like “more powers within the Union” – then there is usually a majority for independence. True, there are polls that come down on the side of the Union but when don’t-knows are stripped out there is more often than not a Yes majority. We need to get that across to our Unionist media who glibly trot out the mantra that “the polls show the Scots like the SNP but not independence”.

So the way forward for us is clear enough and we could have up to three years in which to advance the cause. Three years to bring about the first independence referendum in 300 years seems an attractive bet.

Comments

Joe Middleton 30/08/07
United call for new Holyrood powers

SCOTLAND'S three main Unionist parties joined forces to launch a joint bid for more powers for the Scottish Parliament. Scottish Labour, the Scottish Conservatives and the Scottish Liberal Democrats announced plans for their own "national conversation" to rival that launched by Alex Salmond, the First Minister, earlier this month to push for independence.

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1370472007

Labour and the Liberal Democrats were in power for the last two parliaments. If they had any genuine desire for more powers for the Scottish parliament they would have articulated that desire during their time in power. Although it was not properly reported prior to the election the independence movement as a whole was never more united than at the last election. All the major scottish parties (SNP, Greens, SSP, Solidarity) are agreed on political strategy (ie through a referendum and also delaying a final decision on the EU and monarchy till after independence to ensure maximum unity now) and all were actively working together within the Independence Convention and the referendum campaign Independence First.

In the past Labour and the Lib Dems lined up against the Conservatives for devolution (also motivated by a desire to outflank the SNP). The Conservatives were like King Canute, telling the waves of support for devolution to stop, before being washed away electorally. Now Labour and the Lib Dems have joined forces with the Tories and now effectively speak with one unionist voice bellowing NO to a Scottish public which wants a referendum.
 
'This far and no further' they effectively told the Scottish people at the last election, Deveolution was 'good enough'. Labour subsequently got cuffed by the SNP. Since the elections Labour, Tories and Lib Dems have started issuing joint statements and are now having secret meetings supposedly to call for 'more powers' but actuyally to decide the absolute minimum of power they think Scotland will be satisfied with. The message that their is no difference WHATSOEVER between these parties is now ringing out very loudly and very clearly.

Most polls prior to the election showed a narrow MAJORITY for independence (if don't knows were excluded (see Independence First's website for more info) which explains why the unionst bloc is actually unwilling to countenance a referendum, they might well lose it!

If the unionist parties supported the 'Claim of Right for Scotland' which was the moral basis of the Scottish constitutional Convention in the 1980's then they would respect the Scottish public's desire for a referendum on independence (support for that is at between 60 and 80% according to the polls).

In fact they do not. All are London owned and controlled branches of larger British parties which require the status quo on the union to continue to allow them to gain power at Westminster.
 
The more they act together the more the Scottish public will see who they can trust and who they can't to represent Scottish interests. It's not hard now we see a home grown Scottish party in power to see the difference in political ambition between the current administration and the last.

No doubt mistakes will be made by the SNP but no one can doubt their desire for more power for their fellow Scots. On the other hand one can easily see the moves by the unionists to call for 'more powers' are an obvious and pretty cynical last ditch attempt to hoodwink their fellow Scots out of the natural normal powers of independence.
 

Would you like to comment on this Blog?

If so send us your comment and we will upload it.

Name
Email address
Comments
   

 

 

Home :: About Convention :: The Petition :: Myths&Truths :: Forum :: Contact Us :: Links & Resources :: Events :: Media :: Sign-Up :: The Blog :: Youth Link